|
|
Post by jeepgod on Dec 9, 2006 9:01:21 GMT -3
i mean, without these guys who post on jeep web-sites about baseball the management would never get the line up correct for next season so how does the porn figure in? cause nobody can say "porm" is boring. basball is sooooo boring. its the same thing every season, red sox's play well at first then go to h3ll in a handbasket as the season progesses. |
|
|
|
Post by mprayii on Dec 9, 2006 9:59:46 GMT -3
wowowowow, you actually posted something on topic here! lol
|
|
|
|
Post by ND97 on Dec 9, 2006 14:33:18 GMT -3
Roger Clemens is tied with Cy Young for the most wins in Red Sox history. I wonder if this will come into play when he considers who to play for next year.
He really has nothing left to play for. He has a ton of money, he has his World Series ring, he has his Cy Young awards, he's played in his home town.
The only reason to stick around is for nostalgic reasons. Basically to play on the same team as his son someday (who is about two or three years away from breaking into the majors) and to break the tie with Cy Young.
|
|
|
|
Post by jerryhipp on Dec 9, 2006 15:06:20 GMT -3
roger clemens is indeed one of the best pitchers ever. however he is a 5.00 era pitcher in the al east. he was when he left the yankees and he would be again if he comes back to the east. the only reason he seems to be doing so good is hee's pitching in a easy nl division. just like pedro and bronson arroyo. thats why roger won't comeback to the al east. because he would rather end his career a 2+ era pitcher and a hero, rather than a 5+ era pitcher and a has been.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrometj on Dec 9, 2006 20:51:51 GMT -3
porn is a much more sucessful buisness than baseball
|
|
|
|
Post by ND97 on Dec 10, 2006 13:55:36 GMT -3
porn is a much more sucessful buisness than baseball Do you have any stats to back that up? They are both multi billion dollar industries but Ive never seen any stats to compare them. |
|
|
|
Post by chrometj on Dec 11, 2006 1:12:21 GMT -3
lol, are you kidding neal lol
|
|
|
|
Post by ND97 on Dec 11, 2006 14:43:37 GMT -3
Im not kidding.
|
|
|
|
Post by ND97 on Dec 11, 2006 14:58:55 GMT -3
|
|
|
|
Post by mprayii on Dec 11, 2006 15:38:20 GMT -3
there is a flaw in your research, as I am sure most hookers arent reporting their income to the IRS.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tooch on Dec 11, 2006 15:41:57 GMT -3
Neither does most gambling for that matter. That's partially revenute contributed from baseball. But either way, this has become dumb and stupid. I don't know why Neal is doing this research and I don't care.
|
|
|
|
Post by J.T.Woody on Dec 11, 2006 15:42:08 GMT -3
|
|
|
|
Post by chrometj on Dec 11, 2006 17:53:18 GMT -3
i spend 0 dollars officially on baseball
lol
|
|
